Conservatism, Fundamentalism And The Difference Between The Two

I'm currently reading Andrew Sullivan's The Conservative Soul. In it Sullivan criticizes a faux conservatism that has led to reckless government action, spending and growth. The contemporary movement masquerading as conservatism lacks what in Sullivan's mind is essentially conservative: a chastened rationality marked by a healthy dose of skepticism. At the root of this decidedly unconservative movement is fundamentalism, something that Sullivan sees as essentially antithetical to all that is truly "conservative". Anyone with moderate political sensibilities will find at least some of Sullivan's thought attractive, and much of it at least palpitable. I know I'm finding his book to be a decent read, except where he waxes on about "fundamentalism".

Sullivan's varied characeterizations of fundamentalism aren't so problematic. Fundamentalists "know" the truth in a manner that precludes guessing, arguing, wondering or questioning. For the fundamentalist truth is not something to be "held provisionally, to be tested by further evidence." Fundamentalists don't separate facts from values. 'The values of the fundamentalist are facts...God has revealed them in a book that is inerrant, whether that book is the Bible or the Koran; or he has entrusted them to a hierarchy whose interpretation of scripture and tradition and history and nature is authoritative and even, in some cases, literally infallible."

One might want to quibble at certain points with Sullivan's definition of a fundamentalist (see Newbigin's critique of the fact/value dichotomy in The Gospel In A Pluralist Society, for instance). But more troubling are some of the specific examples he gives of fundamentalists. Case in point, he cites the current pope who in a Christmas sermon remarked: "Without the light of Christ, the light of reason is not sufficient to enlighten humanity and the world." The larger context of the quote is as follows:

At Christmas, the Almighty becomes a child and asks for our help and protection. His way of showing that he is God challenges our way of being human. By knocking at our door, he challenges us and our freedom; he calls us to examine how we understand and live our lives. The modern age is often seen as an awakening of reason from its slumbers, humanity’s enlightenment after an age of darkness. Yet without the light of Christ, the light of reason is not sufficient to enlighten humanity and the world. For this reason, the words of the Christmas Gospel: "the true Light that enlightens every man was coming into this world" (Jn 1:9) resound now more than ever as a proclamation of salvation. "It is only in the mystery of the Word made flesh that the mystery of humanity truly becomes clear" (Gaudium et Spes, 22). The Church does not tire of repeating this message of hope reaffirmed by the Second Vatican Council, which concluded forty years ago.

Benedict is not claiming that secular human reason is bankrupt. He is not asserting that science is some spurious discipline to be eschewed by the Church. He is not decrying philosophy or the benefits that Athens can bring to all the world, including Jerusalem. He is simply saying that if the Gospel is true, then human reason is limited, both in its capacity to understand our own condition and our world. The creature's capacity to reason, grand as it is, will always fall short of the the goal it seeks. Knowledge is certainly possible for autonomous human reason, but the truest and deepest understanding we seek can only be received as a gift of divine grace. If convictions like this make one a fundamentalist, then so be it. Count me among the tribe.

Comments

[Michael Eatmon]

A mono-theistic orthodoxy (with its resultant mono-centric style of psychology, reasoning, behavior, values and the like) cannot support a poly-centric (that is, many centered) society. Democracy is a many centered society by definition. The cultural wars, so called, are the ongoing struggle in the Western soul between the polytheism of Greece (our great founder of democracy but labeled "pagan" as a dirty word) which started democracy and the many centered society in their mythology (and city state style of diverse communities) and the mono-theism of the Levantine mythologies of Zoraostorism, Hebraism, Christinism, and Islam with their communities of tribal hierarchies that are exclusive of each other.

[Give me smile]

Keep posting stuff like this i really like it! Good job friend!

[ecotslance]

best for you replica louis vuitton handbag louis vuitton replicas handbags for less for more

[Where to play poker]

My sincere compliments to your creativity! Your work and in particular your portraits speak so many stories! So much to learn from your work!

[play poker free]

Thanks for your kind comments !
There are many excellent pics in your gallery and you do a great job.
Oscar

[Free Poker Promotions]

Keep your good work!! And thanks for sharing!!
Congrats!!

[Poker International]

Thanks for your kind comments. Looks like you are a world traveler judging by your wonderful posts . I, too, wish to visit your beautiful country one day ;)

[Poker bez depozytu]

Lawrence Solum
I very much enjoyed you work. I look forward to more!

[Bonus Ohne Einzahlung]

I surf your posts when work is slow, very nice for me as long as my boss doesn't find out haha!
Thx for sharing & best regards,
Mike

[Poker Sans depot]

Hey, you have a nice blog. Nice for share this usefull article. Keep up the good work. Really interesting stuff. That's one thing I'm really love it. Looking forward to reading more from you. Thanks for info and good day for You. Till next day. Today i go win million dollars or euro.

[Bonus sin depósito]

What is going on here ?? More informative words i hove not see for long time. just wanted to tell you that I found play casino & poker and I think you will agrre with me that it will interest anybody that would like to play.